I have come to a crossroads as a sportsman. It is time for me, at this stage to get a new hunting dog. Therein lays perhaps the single most important decision a sportsman can make in their career afield. This choice will impact your time afield more than just about any other we make as ourdoorsmen and women. Years of frustration or joy hinge on this decision. So I tread lightly into this verdict and take a methodical approach to the process.
I’m not certain what it takes to buy a dog, other than money. I have read the advice from the professionals who offer; first ask yourself; “What do you want your dog to do?” What kind of question is that? “What ever I train her to do.” That’s what I want her to do. And notice I said, her, because I am convinced that males of dogs or dogs of dogs – whatever we call them nowadays - can only be trained to a certain level. After they reach that level, (and it varies from dog to dog), they cannot be trained any further. No amount of switching or coaxing, feeding, bribing will get the male to go any further in his training. So I will stay with a female. In reality, I am only considering dogs that have a tradition of being bred to perform certain tasks related to hunting. All hunting breeds can be trained to retrieve, and flush to some extent. Most can be trained to do some form of pointing. After that it is only a matter of preference, temperament, size, color, pedigree, location, and of course cost.
I have been studying breed books for months. I have looked at pictures and attended field trials. I have talked with owners and handlers who love their breeds and I have spoken with those who haven’t been very successful with breeds. And through this intensive research I have narrowed it down between the retrieving breeds, the pointing breeds and the flushing breeds. Which, mind you, is exactly where I started.
I know from the onset that I don’t want a
Within the pointing breeds, of which there are many fine strains, I like the English Setter, (for nostalgia reasons) the wirehaired pointer, and the German Shorthair. When we move to the flushing breeds; we find the English Springer Spaniel, the Boykin Spaniel, (again) and the Brittany Spaniel top my list. I would never consider a cocker, or King Charles spaniel, or even the Clumber spaniel, does it really make sense to have a hunting dog that is a clumber? Just his name spells disaster in the field.
Of those listed above…..I quickly eliminated the Portuguese Water Dog for financial and political reasons…..they are simply too expensive, and they are a democrat’s dog. No self respecting republican would ever cut their dogs hair that way so they must be a democrat’s dog. And I want my dog to be my friend, and if we can’t discuss politics and agree from time to time, there is no reason to own one. Next, I have eliminated the Wirehaired because my wife thinks it is ugly and the
When it really comes down to it, there are 3 basic criteria that are the deal breakers and my new dog must meet all three.
1. Looks of the Breed. If it’s ugly – I don’t want it.
2. Size of the dog. I don’t want a dog I can’t carry out of the woods or field. So anything over 50 pounds is immediately eliminated.
3. Temperament of the breed. Is she going to be easy to train and a good companion. (like your children before they reach the teenzilla stage)
Gone is the
That brings me to the Boykin and the Springer – both spaniels. It is these two that are the finalist….along with the Irish water dog…but this is so similar to the Boykin that the Boykin has to get the nod because he’s our state dog.
Springer and Boykin the two breeds that have passed the tests thus far. Both are the right size, both have the temperament needed for a combination lap/hunting/companion dog. Both have beautiful markings and wavy coats. (Something I am partial to) I love the copper wavy coat of the Boykin and the Black and white (or liver and white) patches of the Springer. I love the long ears, and cropped tails.
So now that we have narrowed it down to these two….let us look at them in detail (from my perspective of detail) and make the decision once and for all.
The English Springer, has a great nose, they are known to be much calmer than the Boykin at an early age….but bred more for the show ring than the field. She can be trained to readily retrieve on land and water. Takes commands well and is a fast learner. When a field line can be found they are usually well bred. But there is the slight fear of “Springer fever” a temperament that causes them to sometimes be somewhat unpredictable. Still all in all a good choice.
The Boykin was designed to “not rock the boat” is a wonderful waterfowl retriever. They are great companions, and they have a great nose. Many are taught to flush upland birds and retrieve in fields as well. They do have the reputation of being somewhat high strung as young puppies. Then they are considered to be one of the best companion dogs alive.
So with all else being comparable it comes down to availability and price. The Boykin can be found for a modest price. And the Springer just about half again as much. Here in
But in my gut, I am drawn to the Boykin. When I first saw a young Boykin with that copper wavy coat I immediately fell in love with the animal and have decided that the Boykin is the perfect hunting dog.
I have now begun the tedious process of selecting a name for my copper colored wavy haired Boykin female. After much deliberation, I have decided to name the dog after one of my closest friends and closest hunting companions. The name Walter doesn’t fit a female Boykin. But she doesn’t know that. She doesn’t know that Walter is not a fine name for a beautiful Boykin girl – so barring a protest from her therapist, Walter it is.
So stay tuned and get ready to join me as we share in the trials, tribulations and tales of Walter, my new female Boykin as we cover the fields, forest and water in the years to come.
No comments:
Post a Comment